In summary…

Every company must pay a retirement bonus (IFC) to its retiring employees, as stipulated by the Labor Code or collective bargaining agreement, expressed as a month's salary based on seniority. This social obligation, often overlooked, can represent significant sums that arrive suddenly upon retirement and strain cash flow. An IFC contract allows companies to outsource and smooth this expense: the company pays regular premiums, tax-deductible, and the insurer covers the bonus when it is due.

  • Legal obligation, The IFC is due upon each retirement
  • Commitment to set aside funds, In short, often underestimated by leaders
  • IFC Contract, Deductible payments and a secured, smoothed future charge

Launch the simulator

Estimate your IFC commitment

The simulator estimates the compensation per employee and the total commitment based on seniority. Your data is neither stored nor transmitted.

End-of-career compensation (IFC) simulator

Estimate the retirement severance pay owed to your employees and the social commitment to be provisioned.

years
Review the situation with an advisor

Results are provided for illustrative and educational purposes only, based on the parameters entered and simplified assumptions (2026 tax year, constant return, excluding inflation). They do not constitute personalized investment advice, tax advice, or an offer to subscribe. Some investments carry a risk of capital loss. Before making any decision, consult an advisor.

Why IFC is the hidden debt on the balance sheet

Retirement severance pay is not optional; it is mandatory. Set by the Labor Code or, more generously, by the collective bargaining agreement, it is expressed in months of salary based on the employee's length of service. For a long-serving employee, it can amount to several months' pay. Multiplied by all future retirements, it constitutes a significant social commitment that accounting standards require to be recorded.

The problem isn't so much the amount as its nature: it's a deferred expense, invisible in the current profit and loss statement, which only materializes when employees leave. Many managers only discover its extent late, when several long-term employees leave within a short period and the severance pay arrives all at once, hitting cash flow at the worst possible time.

It is precisely this mechanism—a real but deferred commitment, underestimated because it is invisible—that justifies addressing it proactively. Ignoring the IFC (Individual Financial Framework) does not make it disappear; it silently accumulates on the balance sheet and reminds management of its presence when it is least able to be absorbed. Provisioning for it and financing it gradually transforms an unavoidable expense into a controlled one.

The 3 levers that this simulator highlights

Lever 1: Quantify the commitment before it falls

The first step is to measure the true extent of the commitment: compensation per employee based on seniority and the collective bargaining agreement, projected onto the company's age structure. Many managers have never done this calculation and, when it is presented, discover sums that run into tens or even hundreds of thousands of euros. Putting a number on this hidden debt is essential for any rational provisioning decision.

Lever 2: Smoothing and deducting via an IFC contract

Taking out an employee benefits insurance policy allows you to gradually set aside funds for this expense: the company pays regular premiums, which are tax-deductible, and the insurer handles the payment of the benefit when the time comes. The expense is spread over several fiscal years instead of being a lump sum, secured, and removed from the balance sheet. This is the opposite of the "we'll see when the time comes" approach, which exposes cash flow to the shock of employee departures.

Lever 3: Dimension the contract based on realistic assumptions

The effectiveness of an IFC contract depends on its size: the population covered, assumptions regarding seniority, turnover, and departure date. An undersized contract leaves a portion of the commitment unfunded; an oversized one ties up cash unnecessarily. The calibration, based on realistic assumptions, is carried out with advice in conjunction with the accountant—this is where the true relevance of the system is determined.

Case study: Catherine, 58 years old, manager of an industrial company with 40 employees in Clermont-Ferrand

Catherine has never quantified her IFC commitment. Her company has 5 employees nearing retirement, with an average gross monthly salary of €3,000 and an average length of service of 25 years. Here's what the simulator reveals:

IndicatorPer employee concernedFor the 5 employeesWithout an IFC contract
Average seniority at departure≈ 25 years
Estimated compensation per employee≈ €15,000unfunded expense
Total commitment to finance≈ €75,000falls at the time of departures
Treatment under IFC contractsmoothed premiumsdeductible from profitsecure charging

By doing the math, Catherine discovered a commitment of approximately €75,000 concentrated on five closely spaced departures—a burden that, without planning, would hit her cash flow all at once. By taking out an IFC contract, she spreads this expense over several fiscal years through premiums deductible from her profit, and the insurer takes over when the time comes. The hidden debt becomes a controlled expense, removed from the balance sheet.

The lesson for every manager: the financial commitment doesn't disappear simply by being ignored; it accumulates and resurfaces at the worst possible time. Quantifying the commitment, then setting aside a provision through a contract based on realistic assumptions, transforms an incurred expense into an anticipated and deductible one. This is a sound management practice, too often postponed simply because the calculations haven't been done.

A debt that one chooses to control, or that is imposed upon oneself.

This simulator estimates the compensation per employee and the total commitment based on seniority. But the decision is made beforehand: should provisions be made through an employee benefits contract, and how should it be sized—based on the number of employees covered, seniority assumptions, and turnover rates? A well-designed contract smooths out an unavoidable expense, makes it tax-deductible, and removes it from the balance sheet; if ignored, the commitment impacts cash flow when employees leave.

Balmont Conseil is an objective wealth management firm, a member of ANACOFI, with no capital ties to any bank or insurer. This objectivity allows us to tailor the IFC contract and select it from across the market, in conjunction with your accountant, solely for the benefit of your business. Let's make an appointment to quantify your commitment and secure this expense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the end-of-career bonus mandatory?

Yes. Retirement severance pay is owed by the company to each retiring employee. It is set by the Labor Code or, more often, more generously, by the applicable collective bargaining agreement, and is calculated as a number of months' salary based on seniority. For an employee with long service, it can amount to several months' salary.

Why are we talking about a commitment to set aside funds?

Because the IFC (Individual Financial Commitment) is a deferred expense, certain in principle but future in reality. Accounting standards require that this social commitment be disclosed. Many managers underestimate it because it doesn't appear in the current income statement: it accumulates silently and only materializes when employees leave, often several at once.

How does an IFC contract work?

The company takes out a policy with an insurer and pays regular premiums, which are tax-deductible. The insurer handles the payment of the claim when the time comes. Instead of a lump sum payment upon departure, the expense is thus spread over several fiscal years, secured, and removed from the balance sheet. This is the opposite of the "we'll see when the time comes" approach.

How to properly size an IFC contract?

The sizing is based on the population covered, assumptions regarding seniority, turnover, and departure date. An undersized contract leaves a portion of the commitment unfunded; an oversized one ties up cash unnecessarily. Calibration, based on realistic assumptions, is carried out with advice in conjunction with the chartered accountant—this is where the effectiveness of the system is determined.

What is the difference between Balmont Conseil and a bank advisor?

Balmont Conseil is a consulting firm, a member of ANACOFI, with no financial ties to any bank or insurer. We assess your commitment, design the contract, and select the most suitable one from the market, in collaboration with your accountant. While a bank advisor or insurance agent distributes their network's contract, we tailor a customized solution based on your specific circumstances, solely in the best interest of your business.

Results are provided for illustrative and educational purposes only, based on the parameters entered and simplified assumptions (2026 tax year, constant return, excluding inflation). They do not constitute personalized investment advice, tax advice, or an offer to subscribe. Some investments carry a risk of capital loss. Before making any decision, consult an advisor.